M/S Patna Iron Private Limited v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.691 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14518 of 2022 ====================================================== M/s Patna Iron Private Limited a company registered under Companies Act having its office at Ground Floor, Suprabhat Building, Ceat Compound, Exhibition Road, Patna, through its authorized representative-Santosh Kumar Mandholia (Male) aged about 62 years, S/o Mulchand Mandholia, R/o 32, Krishna Kunj Apartment, Sahdev Mahato Marg Boring Road, Buddha Colony, Patna, PS-SK Puri and District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Industry, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Sandeep Poundrik, Principal Secretary, Department of Industry, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Dr. Pratima, Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of State Tax, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Sri Pankaj Dixit, Director Industries, Department of Industry, Government of Bihar.

5.

Sri Sanjeev Kumar, The Director (Technical Development) Department of Industry, Government of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kinkar Kumar, SC 9 Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Upadhyay, AC to SC 9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 22-09-2023 Pursuant to our earlier order dated 15.09.2023, 4th respondent - Director Industries Department of Industry, Government of Bihar is stated to have filed an affidavit on 20.09.2023. However, Registry has not put up the same on record.

Patna High Court MJC No.691 of 2023(3) dt.22-09-2023 2/2

2. Learned counsel for the 4th respondent submitted that grievance of the petitioner has been set right on 19.09.2023 including payment. In the light of these facts and circumstances, the present M.J.C./contempt petition stands dropped reserving liberty to question any mis-calcuation or if petitioner is not satisfied with the action of the respondents. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) (Arun Kumar Jha, J) GAURAV S./- U