Ranjit Singh @ Ranjeet Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18236 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1438 Year-2016 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== RANJIT SINGH @ RANJEET SINGH, aged about 30 years, Gender-Male, Son of Hariwansh Narayan Singh, Resident of Village - Usufpur, Ladi Berua, P.S.- Gaighat, Distt - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Smt. Rashmi Singh, D/o Late Rakesh Ranjan, Resident of Village - Rasulpur Jilani, Majhauliya Road, P.S.- Kaji Mohammadpur, Distt - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Ram Bachan Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-08-2020 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

The matter has been listed under the heading 'For Orders' under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A) of the IPC and 4 of the D. P. Act.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18236 of 2020(2) dt.13-08-2020 2/3 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner is the husband of the victim. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. East, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1438 of 2016, corresponding to Trial No. 2046 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18236 of 2020(2) dt.13-08-2020 3/3 Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of seven weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T