Patna High CourtCR. WJC/488/2016disposed

Bir Bahadur Singh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And ORS

2016-07-05The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.488 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Bir Bahadur Singh Yadav Son of Late Lakshman Singh, Resident of Village+Post Office- Gangauli, Anchal- Dehri, P.S. Dalmiyanagar, District- Rohtas (Bihar).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas at Sasaram.

5. The Officer-in-Charge, of Police Station Dalmiyanagar.

6. Ajay Kumar Singh Son of Ram Adhar Singh

7. Jitendra Kumar Singh Son of Ram Badan Singh @ Ram Prasad

8. Manish Yadav, Son of Ajay Kumar Singh, Respondent No.6 to 8 are Residents of Village+P.O. Gangauli, Anchal Dehri, P.S. Dalmiyanagar, District- Rohtas (Bihar).

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Purnendu Singh, GP-27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 05-07-2016 Heard Mr. Akhileshwar Pandey, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Purnendu Singh, learned Government Pleader No.27, appearing on behalf of Staterespondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file complaint, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.488 of 2016 (2) dt.05-07-2016 2/2 withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to file complaint, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

Mkr./- (I.A. Ansari, ACJ.) U T