Patna High CourtC. REV./252/2014dismissed

The Senior Regional Manager, Patna And ORS. v. M/S Shree Bishwanath Jee Rice Mills And ANR.

2015-08-26Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.252 of 2014 In C. REV. 328 of 2011 ======================================================

1. The Senior Regional Manager, now General Manager , Food Corporation of India, Exhibition Road, Arunachal Bhawan, Patna.

2. The food Corporation of India Constituted under the Food Corporation of India Act,1964 (Central act 37 of 1974) having its Headquarters situated of india, 16-2- Brakhamba Lane, New Delhi-1 through its managing Director.

3. The Manager (M & P) Food Corporation of India, 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Dwlhi-1

4. The Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India,Regional Office, Exhibition Road, Patna.

5. The District Manager , Food Corporation of India, Firdaus Building, Road, Patna.

6. The Purchase Incharge, food Corporation of India, FSD, Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. M/s Shree Bishwanath jee Rice Mills, a Partnership firm haiving its place of business at Gajadharganj, (Buxer) District- Buxer, through its one of partners Shree Hem Prakash.

2. The Union of India through its Under Secretary, Ministry of Consumer Affairs and Public Distrition (Departmemt of Public Distribution), Krishi Bhawan, New delhi.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sachida Nand Kishore Pd. Sinha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 26-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the Union of India.

Besides the fact that no ground for review of the order in question is made out specially, in the background that even the Division Bench refused to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge, the Review Application is also delayed by more than 01 year, 04 months and 18 days.

Patna High Court C. REV. No.252 of 2014 (4) dt.26-08-2015 Even if the limitation aspect is ignored, the review even otherwise is required to be dismissed as no interference is warranted with the order in question.

The Review Application stands rejected along with limitation petition.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) P.K./- U