Rajeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19321 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2021 Thana- NARDIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.
RAJEEV KUMAR Son of Siyasharan Prasad Resident of Village - Hiraman Bigha, P.S.- Nardiganj, District - Nawada.
2.
Siyasharan Prasad Son of Late Bhagwat Mahto Resident of Village - Hiraman Bigha, P.S.- Nardiganj, District - Nawada. 3.
Punam Kumari Daughter of Siyasharan Prasad Resident of Village - Hiraman Bigha, P.S.- Nardiganj, District - Nawada. 4.
Manju Devi Wife of Siyasharan Prasad Resident of Village - Hiraman Bigha, P.S.- Nardiganj, District - Nawada.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Prem Ranjan Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 23-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence u/s 341, 323, 308, 379, 354, 504/34 of the IPC. Allegedly, the petitioners are said to have indiscriminately assaulted the informant's side by means of various weapons. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19321 of 2022(2) dt.23-08-2022 2/2 petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is submitted that the parties are agnates and the injuries are simple in nature. It is further submitted that the parties have entered into a compromise. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the injuries are simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No.89 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T