← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4060/1997withdrawn

Satto Rai And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-04-16Mr. Justice V. Nath2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4059 of 1997 ======================================================

1. Satto Rai

2. Jasho Rai

3. Sudama Rai

4. Sone Lal Rai, all sons of Prabhu Rai

5. Sib Chandar Rai,

6. Sarif Lal Rai

7. Parshish Lal Rai, all sons of Raj Narain Rai All resident of Village Jirwara P.S. Mahua, District Vaishali .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through Collector,Vaishali

2. The Joint Director of Consolidation, Muzaffarpur

3. The Assistant Consolidation Officer, Mahua, District Vaishali .... .... Respondents ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4060 of 1997 ======================================================

8. Satto Rai

9. Jasho Rai

10. Sudama Rai

11. Sone Lal Rai, all sons of Prabhu Rai

12. Sib Chandar Rai,

13. Sarif Lal Rai

14. Parashish Lal Rai, all sons of Raj Narain Rai All resident of Village Jirwara P.S. Mahua, District Vaishali .... .... Petitioners

Versus

4. The State of Bihar, through Collector,Vaishali

5. The Joint Director of Consolidation, Muzaffarpur

6. The Deputy Director of Consolidation, Vaishali at Hajipur .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CWJC No.4059 of 1997) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp2) (In CWJC No.4060 of 1997) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp2) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 16-04-2015 Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw these writ

Patna High Court CWJC No.4059 of 1997 (3) dt.16-04-2015 applications with liberty to move before the Civil Court with appropriate relief.

Learned Counsel for the State respondents is present and raises no objection.

As such, these writ applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to move before the Civil Court with appropriate reliefs in accordance with law. (V. Nath, J.) Snkumar/- U