Patna High CourtC. REV./116/1996consigned

The Secretary,Pri.Sec.And Mass E v. Laxmi Narain Thakur And ORS

2019-09-25The Chief Justice-,Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.116 of 1996 ======================================================

1. The Secretary, Primary, Secondary and Mass Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Additional Secretary, Primary, Secondary and Mass Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Special Director, Primary, Secondary and Mass Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Laxmi Narain Thakur, son of late Uttan Lal Thakur.

2. Umesh Rai, son of Basudeo Rai

3. Kulanand Thakur, son of Shri Buchhi Thakur

4. Gopi Raman Chaudhary, son of late Chakradhar Chaudhary

5. Bishnu Kant Mishra, son of Mohan Mishra

6. Arun Kumar Jha, son of Sri Narain Ji Jha

7. Ram Nath Thakur, son of Rateneshwar Thakur.

8. Ram Bachan Thakur, son of Siyasaran Thakur

9. Ratneshwar Thakur, son of late Uttan Lal Thakur.

10. Sheo Ji Mandal, son of late Rameshwar Mandal ...... ... Respondents 1st Set.

11. The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Boring Canal Road, Patna.

12. The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Bihar, Patna. ..... Respondents 2nd Set.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raza Ahmad, AAG-5 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 25-09-2019 We had adjourned the matter on 19th September, 2019 providing time till today and we had made it clear that the matter would not be adjourned any further, yet learned Additional Advocate General Shri Raza Ahmad submits that if the matter could be adjourned further he may be able to receive appropriate instructions.

Patna High Court C. REV. No.116 of 1996(4) dt.25-09-2019 2/2 We are not inclined to grant any further adjournment as this review application was filed in the year 1996 and there is every possibility of the judgement having been either implemented or otherwise the petitioners therein may have lost interest due to passage of time.

We accordingly consign this review application to records.

(Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ) (Ashutosh Kumar, J) Sunil/- U