Patna High CourtCWJC/8385/1997dfd for non appearance

Rameshwar Ram And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-04-23Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8385 of 1997 ===========================================================

1. Rameshwar Ram S/o late Kailu Ram

2. Gyatri Devi wife of Kailu Ram

3. Parmila Devi daughter of late Kailu Ram wife of Kishundeo Ram All the aforesaid three petitioners are residents of vill.-Hirday Nagar, P.S. Birpur, P.O. Basantpur, Dist. Supaul.

4. Uma Devi daughter of late Kailu Ram wife of Shri Ganga Ram Resident of village Sitapur, P.O.+ P.S. Kanchanpur, District Saptari ( Nepal).

5. Nirmala Devi daughter of Late Kailu Ram wife of Sakaldeo Ram Resident of village Balua-Ghoghanpur, P.O.+P.S. Kanchanpur, District Saptari (Nepal)

6. Gangiya Devi daughter of Late Kailu Ram wife of Rajesh Ram R/o village Madhuwapur Arri, P.O.+ P.S. Bhardah, District Saptari ( Nepal).

7. Beli Devi daughter of Late Kailu Ram wife of Yogendra Ram. R/o village Sitapur, P.S. Karjain Bazar, P.O. Hariraha Bazar, District - Supaul. .. ...... Petitioners.

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Consolidation Officer, Basantpur at Post Basantpur, District Supaul.

3. The Deputy Director, Saharsa at Post+District-Saharsa.

4. The Deputy Director of Consolidation, Purnea ( Incharge Director, Bihar, Patna at + Post+ District-Purnea).

5. Chandradeo Bhirbar S/o Ghutar Bhirbar.

6. Yogendra Bhirbar S/o Mahabir Bhirwar

7. Gajendra Bhirbar S/o Chichai Bhirwar All respondents nos. 5 to 7 residents of village Hirday Nagar, Post Basantpur, P.S. Birpur, Dist. Supaul.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : None For the Respondent : None =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-04-2015 Despite repeated calls nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Same is the case with the respondents as well as the State.

The writ application arises out of a consolidation proceeding. The petitioners lost in all the three Courts below.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8385 of 1997 dt.23-04-2015 2/2 Be that as it may, since no one has appeared on repeated calls to press this application, this Court is constrained to dismiss this writ application for non- prosecution.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U