Rajneesh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3261 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 399 of 2012 ====================================================== Rajneesh son of Ramdeo Prasad, resident of Village- Mohammadpur, P.S.- Nagarnausa, District- Nalanda.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, Through The Finance Commissioner, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna.
2. Sri Rameshwar Singh, name of father not known, The Finance Commissioner, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna.
3. Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, name of father not known, The Joint Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna.
4. Sri Chanchal Kumar, name of father not known, The Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Vishwaswaraiya Bhawvan, Bailey Road, Patna.
5. Sri Arun Kumar, name of father not known, The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Vishwaswaraiya Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna.
6. Sri Dharmendra Singh, namely of father not known, The Principal Secretary, Personnel and Adminstrative Reforms Department (General Administrative), Old Secretariat, Patna.
.... .... Opp.Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramendra Nath Mukhopadhaya For the Respondent/s : Md. Nadim Seraj ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 08-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Having regard to the fact that the direction given by this Court in the order dated 3.1.2013 in C.W.J.C.No. 399/2012 has already been complied, this Court will have no difficulty in accepting the remaining submission of Mr. R.N.Mukhopadhaya, learned counsel for the petitioner, that this contempt application should be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to assail the
Patna High Court MJC No.3261 of 2014 (2) dt.08-09-2015 order that has been passed in compliance of the aforementioned order of this Court.
That being so, this application is disposed of with the aforementioned liberty.
(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) surendra/- U