Md. Murshid v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6422 of 2019 ====================================================== Md. Murshid aged about 55 years Male Son of Md. Anul Haque resident of Village-Hajratganj Khankah, P.S.-Kotwali, Dist-Munger. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Revenue Department. 2.

Principal Secretary Revenue Department State of Bihar. 3.

The Collector Munger.

4.

The Dy. Development Commissioner, Munger.

5.

The D.C.L.R Munger.

6.

The Sub-registrar registry office Munger.

7.

The Anchal Adhikari Sadar Munger.

8.

Bijay Kumar Gupta Son of Late Ramchandra Prasad Gupta Resident of Mohalla-Madhopur Krishna Sadan, P.S.-Kotwali, Dist-Munger. 9.

Arun Kumar Gupta Son of Late Ramchandra Prasad Gupta Resident of Mohalla-Madhopur Krishna Sadan, P.S.-Kotwali, Dist-Munger. 10.

Ravi Kumar Son of Bijay Kumar Gupta Resident of Mohalla-Madhopur Krishna Sadan, P.S.-Kotwali, Dist-Munger.

11.

Ritesh Kumar Son of Bijay Kumar Gupta Resident of Mohalla-Madhopur Krishna Sadan, P.S.-Kotwali, Dist-Munger.

12.

Aditya Kumar Son of Arun Kumar Gupta Resident of Mohalla-Madhopur Krishna Sadan, P.S.-Kotwali, Dist-Munger.

13.

Md. Naushad Son of Md. Latif Resident of-At Madhopur, P.S-Kotwali, DistMunger, present Resident at-Reliance cloth store, Chowk Bazar, P.SKotwali, Dist-Munger. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Prasad Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) 02-04-2019 Heard the parties.

Though remedy is available to the petitioner under the provisions of Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956

Patna High Court CWJC No.6422 of 2019(2) dt.02-04-2019 2/2 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), yet without taking recourse to the statutory remedy so available that he moves in Public Interest.

No cause for indulgence is made out. The writ petition is dismissed.

The petitioner, if so advised, can move before the appropriate forum by filing appropriate application under 'the Act'.

(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Arvind Srivastava, J) Archana/ Surendra/- U