← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18029/2022bail rejected

Dinesh Kumar Chauhan @ Dinesh Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-01Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18029 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2021 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== DINESH KUMAR CHAUHAN @ DINESH CHAUHAN Son of Rajendra Chauhan Resident of village - Narhan, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District - Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant alleges that on 5.01.2021, at 4:00 am her minor daughter had gone to attend natures call outside the house but when she did not return, a search was made and when the informant came to know that the accused persons including the petitioner had kidnapped the victim with an intention to marry.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18029 of 2022(3) dt.01-12-2022 2/2 and the victim were in love and they had eloped, it is also submitted that victim is not a minor rather is a major. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that the victim has supported the case of the prosecution in her statement under Section 164 of CrPC wherein, she has stated that she was brought to Patna where she was ravished.

Considering the submissions made by the learned A.P.P., the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege to anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T