Ganesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19309 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-269 Year-2024 Thana- ITARHI District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.

Ganesh Yadav S/o- Jawahir Singh @ Jawahir Yadav Village- Gopalpur PSItarhi, Dist- Buxar 2.

Rama Yadav @ Rama Shankar Yadav S/o- Jawahir Singh @ Jawahir Yadav Village- Gopalpur PS- Itarhi, Dist- Buxar 3.

Guddu Yadav S/o- Rama Shankar Yadav @ Rama Yadav Village- Gopalpur PS- Itarhi, Dist- Buxar 4.

Uma Yadav @ Uma Shankar Yadav S/o- Vijay Yadav Village- Gopalpur PSItarhi, Dist- Buxar 5.

Dinesh Yadav S/o- Vijay Yadav Village- Gopalpur PS- Itarhi, Dist- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar = ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-05-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 223 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and on account of disputes relating to land, an altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature, i.e., no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19309 of 2025(3) dt.15-05-2025 2/2 specific allegation of assault is alleged against any of the petitioners. It is also submitted that no doubt two persons received grievous injury, but then the allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that from side of the petitioners also, some persons received injury. It is next submitted that petitioners are not criminals and the parties have compromised.

4.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

5.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Itarhi P.S. Case No. 269 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T