← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20477/2024bail granted

Birendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-27Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20477 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2023 Thana- DURGAWATI District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Birendra Kumar Son of Randhir Singh Resident of vill.-Bhambhewa Beri, P.S.-Dhinthas(Dujjana), Distt.-Jhajjar, (Hariyana) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1)(2) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 2646.72 litres from a truck.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is a business man and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized truck. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20477 of 2024(2) dt.27-03-2024 2/2 implicated and at the same time, will bring disrepute to his business. It is further submitted that the truck was taken by one Jitendra Kumar on the pretext that he intends to purchase the truck and as such it appears that before the truck could be transferred in his name, he used the said vehicle for illegal purpose, when petitioner admittedly is a person with clean antecedents.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case No. 26 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T