← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7849/2012dismissed

Manoj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-06-27Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7849 of 2012 =========================================================== Manoj Kumar Singh Son of Sri Badri Narayan Singh Resident of Village - Khangaon, P.S. Pandoul, District- Madhubani .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna

3. Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Ashok Kumar Keshri AAG 11 Mr. Amarjeet Prabhakar, AC to AAG 11 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 27-06-2016 None appears on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner's contention that the impugned order dated 02.04.2012 has been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice is ex facie incorrect as the impugned order itself narrates that numerous letters had been issued to the petitioner prior to passing of the order of blacklisting. Moreover, it is an admitted fact in paragraph 4 of the writ petition that the work in question was required to be started on 10.11.2009 which was to be completed on 09.11.2010 whereas the petitioner committed gross irregularities pursuant to which the petitioner has been blacklisted much later in the year 2012. It is,

Patna High Court CWJC No.7849 of 2012 dt.27-06-2016 2/2 therefore, submitted that the impugned order has been passed after affording due opportunity to the petitioner and the respondents cannot be faulted for the action taken against the petitioner on the ground of arbitrariness.

3. Having regard to the submissions of the learned counsel for the respondents, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 28.06.2016 Transmission Date N/A