Patna High CourtMJC/3268/2014disposed

Binod Kumar Pathak v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-07-01The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3268 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9896 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Binod Kumar Pathak adopted son of Chandrika pathak. Resident of village- Pathkhawalia, Police Station- Kudra, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar ( Formal Party ).

2. Sri Pramod Kumar Chaubey, the Then Circle Officer, Kudra District - Kaimur. Presently posted as Circle Officer- Barahari, District- Siwan.

3. Sri Md. Allauddin Ansari, Circle Officer, Kudra District- Kaimur.

4. Girdhari Devi, wife of Late Ram Brichha Pathak, Resident of villageHarla, Police Station-Sonhan, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.

5. Mohan Pal, son of late Jashabali Pal,

6. Anil Kumar Pal, son of Murari Pal, Both Resident of village- Jahanabad Tola Lalapur, Police Station- Kudra, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.

7. Jitendra Kumar Singh, son of Lalji Singh,

8. Smt. Sushila Devi, wife of Jitendra Kumarn Singh, Both resident of Gudura, P.o. and P.S. kudra, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.

9. Mrituanjaya Kumar Bharati, son of Ram ji Ram, Resident of villageSakari, P.O. and P.S. Kudra.District- Kaimur at Bhabua. Chairman, New Life Mission Church India, near Magadh Gas Godam, Balupar Kuan, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 01-07-2017 Considering the fact that C.W.J.C. No.9896 of 2012

Patna High Court MJC No.3268 of 2014 (4) dt.01-07-2017 2/2 has been withdrawn with liberty granted to the parties to agitate the matter in accordance with the provisions available under law, on account of the breach of status quo granted by virtue of interlocutory order, no case is made out for initiating action for contempt.

The application is disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) K.C.jha/- U