Mohan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27534 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2019 Thana- SARMERA District- Nalanda ====================================================== MOHAN YADAV Son of Khanahai Lal @ Kanhaiya Yadav Resident of Village - Narsingpur, P.S. - Sarmera, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 29-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, the sister of the informant was done to death by the accused persons including the petitioner herein who happens to be the husband of the deceased.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The allegations are general and omnibus in nature. He happens to be the unfortunate husband of the deceased. The sister of the informant died as a result of snakebite. The petitioner is in custody since 29.10.2020 and has no criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27534 of 2021(3) dt.29-11-2021 2/2 The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that from perusal of the allegations in the F.I.R. itself, it would transpire that the petitioner, who is the husband of the deceased, is not only named in the F.I.R. but there is direct allegation against him. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case, the allegations levelled in the F.I.R. together with the petitioner being the husband of the deceased, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected. Learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T