← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22265/2021bail granted

Shashi Ranjan Kumar @ Shashideo Kumar @ Pachkhuria v. The State Of Bihar

2021-07-08Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22265 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2020 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== SHASHI RANJAN KUMAR @ SHASHIDEO KUMAR @ PACHKHURIA, aged about 22 years, Male, Son of Ram Udesh Mahto, Resident of Village - Virsahiya Singhia Buzurg south, P.S. - Vibhutipur @ Bibhutipur, District - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Kumar Praveen, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Chandra Sen, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-07-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through Virtual mode.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 386, 387, 307/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the petitioner alongwith three unknown co-accused persons came on two motorcycles and fired indiscriminately upon the informant and his family members and demanded Rangdari of Rs. 4,00,000/- from the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22265 of 2021(2) dt.08-07-2021 2/3 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Though there is allegation of firing alleged against the petitioner and other coaccused but none is said to have been injured in course of occurrence. The informant has filed a petition in the learned court below where he has retracted from his earlier statement made in the F.I.R.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-II, Rosera, Samastipur, in connection with Vibhutipur/Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 283/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22265 of 2021(2) dt.08-07-2021 3/3 eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T