← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10927/2021allowed

Gunjesh Narayan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-30Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10927 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-444 Year-2018 Thana- BHAGWAN BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== GUNJESH NARAYAN, S/o Sushil Kumar Jaiswal Resident of MohallaChhatradhari Bazar, Hospital Chok, P.S.- Bhagwan Bazar, Distt- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar.

2.

Anjali Kumari D/o Anil Chaudhary Resident of Village- Sitapur, P.S.- Dighwara, Distt- Saran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dr. Alok Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP For the O.P. No.2 :

Mr. Kaushal Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-01-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State along with learned counsel for the O.P. No.2, Mr. Kaushal Kumar.

2. The learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 at the outset submits that he has instruction on behalf of the O.P. No.2 not to oppose the quashing application and the O.P. No.2 shall have no objection in the event if the quashing application is allowed and the order impugned is quashed.

3. It is next submitted that the dispute was purely matrimonial and the parties have obtained divorce by mutual consent and the O.P. No.2 has already performed her marriage with Avinash Kumar Chaudhary in the year 2019.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner also concurs

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10927 of 2021(4) dt.30-01-2024 2/2 with the submission of the learned counsel for the O.P. No.2.

5. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the O.P. No.2 the entire proceedings arising from Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No.444 of 2018 registered under Section 199, 498A, 494, 406, 323, 384, 467, 468, 471 and 420 of the IPC read with Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act is hereby quashed.

6. The investigating officer of the case in compliance of the order dated 20.06.2023 is present in the Court. The personal appearance of the investigating officer of the case is dispensed with.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T