Nawal Kishor Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6965 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Nawal Kishor Kumar, Son of Ramjee Ram, Resident of Village/MohallaGabrapar (Chamartoli), P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda. 2.

Ashok Kumar, Son of Devnarayan Ram, Resident of Village + P.O.- Karma Bhagwanpur, P.S.- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad. 3.

Vishundeo Gahlaut, Son of Late Ram Sundar Gahhlaut, Resident of Village Sonbarsha, P.S.- Amba, District- Aurangabad.

4.

Satyanarayan Pandey, Son of Late Shivjee Pandey, Resident of VillageDehri Barna, P.S.- Rajpur, District- Rohtash. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar. 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Personal and Administrative Reforms Department Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Agriculture Production Commissioner, Department of Agriculture, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Joint Secretary, Department of Agriculture, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Administrator, Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board (ABOISHED), Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

6.

The Sub- Divisional Officer-cum- Special Officer Agriculture Produce Market Committee (Abolished) Hilsa Bazar Samiti, District- Nalanda. 7.

The Sub- Divisional Officer Aurangabad- cum- Special Officer Agriculture Produce Market Committee (Abolished) Aurangabad Bazar Samittee, District- Aurangabad.

8.

The Sub- Divisional Officer Rohtash- cum- Special Officer Agriculture Produce Market Committee (Abolished) Natwar Bazar Samitee, DistrictRohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Kumari Sujata Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Gajendra Prasad Yadav (SC-17) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 22-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. In the instant petition, the petitioners are not crystal clear as to what benefit they are entitled to.

Patna High Court CWJC No.6965 of 2020 dt.22-12-2021 2/2

3. Since the pleadings are short of material information, the writ petition stands dismissed reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the respondents with crystal clear prayer.

4. The writ petition stands dismissed.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 05.01.2022 Transmission Date NA