Vijay Chand Kumhar @ Vijaychand Kohar @ Vijay Chandra Kumhar @ Vijay Chandra Kohar @ Bichchan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20094 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-515 Year-2025 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Vijay Chand Kumhar @ Vijaychand Kohar @ Vijay Chandra Kumhar @ Vijay Chandra Kohar @ Bichchan Son of Bhangi Kumhar @ Bhangi Prasad R/O Village - Ameya, P.S.- Kateya, District - Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vikash Kumar Shukla For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No.515 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioner came to his house on 12.09.2025 at 7 P.M. and started abusing, on protest, petitioner assaulted the informant by Dab (axe) causing injury on head, thereafter Sandeep assaulted him by farsha causing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20094 of 2026(5) dt.29-06-2026 2/3 injury on head, while Pushpa Devi assaulted the informant by Gandasa causing injury, thereafter Sandeep assaulted his nephew by farsha causing injury on head and petitioner assaulted by Gandasa and Pushpa assaulted Reeta by Gandasa causing injury on head and Sandeep assaulted Archana by Dab causing injury on head and petitioner snatched chain of his nephew.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner and the informant are co-villager and are having dispute relating to passage and thus an altercation took place, in which both side assaulted each other. It is also submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that specific allegation of assaulting the informant by Gandasa is alleged against petitioner, Sandeep and Pushpa, as such it cannot be alleged with certainty that whose blow caused injury to the informant.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant submits that head is a vital part of the body and specific allegation of assaulting the informant on head

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20094 of 2026(5) dt.29-06-2026 3/3 by Gandasa is against petitioner and Pushpa. It is also submitted that from perusal of the order impugned, it would manifest that four injuries have been found on the person of the injured i.e. informant and two injuries have been opined to be grievous in nature.

6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and taking into considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the informant, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T