Shambhu Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.51848 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2015 Thana -IMAMGANJ District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Shambhu Singh, Son of Late Bhagwat Singh, Resident of Village-Parsia, P.S.-Imamganj, District-Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Imamganj P.S.Case No.100 of 2015 registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. Allegation against the petitioner is that he called the deceased and thereafter in conspiracy killed the deceased.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except suspicion on the basis of the fact that he has caused the death of the deceased, there is absolutely nothing against him and no any incriminating circumstance has come against him. He is in custody for six months.
Heard learned A.P.P. also, who could not controvert the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51848 of 2017 (3) dt.22-11-2017 2/3 above facts.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Imamganj P.S.Case no.100 of 2015 dated 31.7.2015.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51848 of 2017 (3) dt.22-11-2017 3/3