Ajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25751 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2019 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== AJEET KUMAR SON OF MADAN RAI R/O VILLAGE- SUTIHAR, P.S.- DERNI, DISTRICT- SARAN AT CHAPRA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-08-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

4. The informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioner kidnapped her minor daughter, it is next alleged that earlier also the accused persons have tried to kidnap her daughter but had sought forgiveness.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25751 of 2023(3) dt.17-08-2023 2/3 case, it is next submitted that petitioner and the victim were in love and they eloped, it is next submitted that they have performed their marriage and out of the wedlock two children were born. It is further submitted that victim is staying with the petitioner at her matrimonial home. It is further submitted that the victim has also filed an affidavit before the learned Trial court bringing to its notice that she has married the petitioner. It is further submitted that when the affidavit was filed at that time only one child was born, but presently the petitioner and the victim are having two children, it is also submitted that the victim has denied the case of abduction.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25751 of 2023(3) dt.17-08-2023 3/3 where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 280 of 2019 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

8. However, the informant would be at liberty to seek cancellation of the anticipatory bail order of the petitioner in the event if what has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner are not the correct facts.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T