← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9712/2016disposed

Vijay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-01-11Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9712 of 2016 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar Singh son of Late Hari Nandan Singh resident of Village - Balhi Teghra, Police Station - Simri Bakhtiarpur, District - Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3.

The Director, Secondary Education, Budha Marg, Patna. 4.

The Director, Mass Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Babita Kumari, A.C. to S.C.-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-01-2024 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed several representations before the respondent No.3 and the respondent No.3 has not taken any action as yet and the similarly situated persons have been granted the benefit as petitioner demanded by way of writ application.

3. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ application is disposed of with direction to the petitioner to file a detailed representation alongwith supporting documents before the respondent No.3 and the respondent No.3 is directed

Patna High Court CWJC No.9712 of 2016(5) dt.11-01-2024 2/2 to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and the respondent No.3 is found in favour of the petitioner, the consequential benefit would be paid to the petitioner within a period of further three months. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U