Krishndev Yadav @ Krishnadeo Yadav @ Musharu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16870 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2025 Thana- PRATAPGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== Krishndev Yadav @ Krishnadeo Yadav @ Musharu Yadav S/O Vasudev Yadav @ Basudeo Yadav Resident of village - Shripur, Ward No. 11, Police Station - Pratapganj, District - Supaul ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Pratapganj P.S. Case No. 205 of 2025 for the offence punishable under Section 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(3), 351(2), and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons, forming an unlawful assembly and armed with lethal weapons, came at the door steps of the informant and upon the orders of co-accused Gajendra Yadav, the petitioner started assaulting the informant by means of knife. When the brother of the informant, Bindeshwari Yadav, came to intervene, then the petitioner is alleged to have assaulted him by means of knife (a sharp cutting weapon) on his head and also snatched silver chain.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16870 of 2026(3) dt.29-04-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there happens to be a case and counter case between the parties, while the counter case has been lodged against the informant and other family members in which the petitioner's side received grievous injuries. It has been submitted that the injury report does not support the allegation of the prosecution against the petitioner inasmuch as the injury sustained by the brother of the informant has been opined to have been caused by a hard and blunt substance being grievous in nature and not by a sharp pointed or sharp cutting weapon.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Heard the parties and perused the record. Considering the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest/surrender within six weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Birpur (Supaul), in connection with Pratapganj P.S. Case No. 205 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. (Praveen Kumar, J) Pawan/- U T