Rajeev Kumar Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15679 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-299 Year-2019 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Banka ====================================================== RAJEEV KUMAR RANJAN, aged 26 years (Male), Son of Bindeshwari Pandit, Resident of Village - Bara, P.S.- Belhar, Dist.- Banka. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Punam Kumari, aged about 22 years (Female), W/o Rajeev Kr. Ranjan, D/o Nilambuj Pandit Resident of Village - Bahjora, P.S.- Belhar, Dist.- Banka. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate.

For the State :

Mrs.Sucheta Yadav, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-07-2020 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

The matter has been listed under the heading 'For Orders' under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 323, 498(A), 379, 504 and 506 of the IPC in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498(A) of the I.P.C.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to non-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15679 of 2020(2) dt.13-07-2020 2/3 fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is the husband of the victim. On earlier occasion also, a similar case was instituted by the complainant against the petitioner. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class/Successor Court, Banka, in connection with Complaint Case No. 299/19, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15679 of 2020(2) dt.13-07-2020 3/3 Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of seven weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T