Yugal Yadav @ Yugal Kishore Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17071 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2022 Thana- CHANDAN District- Banka ====================================================== YUGAL YADAV @ YUGAL KISHORE YADAV SON OF DINESHWRA @ BINOD YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - KHONTA, P.S. - BELHAR, DIST. - BANKA.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 385, 386 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, informant talked with an unknown person, who called to his brother's mobile and demanded of Rs. 2,50,000/- from informant's brother and threatened to kill, if fails. It is further alleged that said unknown person also started talking with the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. The mobile, which is used in the demand of ransom money does not belong to the petitioner. He submitted that one mobile was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17071 of 2023(2) dt.11-05-2023 2/2 recovered from right hand of Sulekha Devi, Wife of Sudik Singh of village- Bachwara, and police stated in seizure list that said recovery was made from Sulekha Devi in front of house of the petitioner and a copy of the seizure list handed over to Sulekha Devi not handed over to the petitioner. No incriminating article has recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He is languishing in judicial custody since 03.10.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Banka in connection with Chandan P.S. Case No. 153 of 2022. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T