Brahmdeo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23690 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2017 Thana- SONO District- Jamui ====================================================== Brahmdeo Yadav, male, aged about 74 years, Son of Late Thanu Yadav, Resident of Village - Agahara, Chapari, P.S. Sono, District - Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Prakash Parasar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 178/2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 302/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is serious in nature. The informant and his other family members were engaged in cultivation work, all of a sudden, under planning of accused persons including the petitioner came there with deadly weapon and brutally assaulted, due to which causing death of two persons and one got some injuries.

The learned counsel for the informant submits that out of five witnesses only two witnesses have been examined so far.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23690 of 2019(4) dt.27-06-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 178/2017 from the Court of learned A.C.J.M.-1st, Jamui. This application is disposed of accordingly.

(However, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of six months from today. If trial is not concluded within a period of six months, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before this Hon'ble Court.) (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T