← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21770/2024bail rejected

Abhishek Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-12Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21770 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2022 Thana- AWTARNAGAR District- Saran ====================================================== ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGH S/O SHIVNATH SINGH R/O VILLAGEMEHRAULI, BAHIROPUR NIZAMAT, P.S- DORIGANJ, DISTT.- SARAN AT CHAPRA (BIHAR).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

MINES DEPARTMENT, SARAN AT CHAPRA. BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP For Mines :

Mr. Naresh Dikpul , Advocate Mr. Brij Bihari Tiwary, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341 , 323 , 384, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. As per the prosecution case , it is alleged that informant along with his companion chaukidar were deputed to keep watch on 12 trucks which was seized in connection with Awatar Nagar Police station Case No. 126 of 2022 but on 26.06.2022 at about 03:00 AM early in the morning, the owners and drivers of the aforesaid trucks came and forcibly took away the trucks and fled away .

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21770 of 2024(5) dt.12-07-2024 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been falsely been implicated in this case merely because he happens to be the owner of the truck in question . The said vehicle was driven by the driver on the permission of the informant and as such the entire prosecution case is false and fabricated.

5 . However, learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he is the owner of one of the seized the trucks whose number is UP-53 -AT-8045 and on the alleged date and time of occurrence , this petitioner along with other coaccused persons forcibly took away the seized trucks from the possession of the police which were seized in connection with Awatar Nagar Police station Case No. 126 of 2022 .

6. Considering the nature of accusation and also the fact that petitioner is owner of one of the seized vehicles, prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T