Ashok Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21136 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-750 Year-2023 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ashok Ram Son of Ram Kishun Ram Resident of Village- Math Lohiyar Tola Chhatwaniya, P.S.- Harsidhi, Distt.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sunil Kumar No.III, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Amit Anand, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 750 of 2023, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 354(B), 447, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code was added.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons armed with Tangi, lathi and iron rod went to the house of the informant and started abusing him. On protest, the accused persons assaulted him and his family members due to which they sustained injuries. It is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21136 of 2025(4) dt.15-07-2025 2/3 further alleged that the petitioner has assaulted wife of the informant by means of iron rod due to which her right hand got fractured.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that both the parties are pattidars and on account of land dispute a quarrel took place and as a result of which free fight took place and both side sustained injury. It is further submitted that as per supplementary affidavit, injury no. 1 is grievous and injury no. 2 is simple in nature which has been sustained by informant's wife. by The petitioner is in custody since 21.12.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21136 of 2025(4) dt.15-07-2025 3/3
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 750 of 2023.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T