Tahid Ansari @ Raja Babu @ Tauhid Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17333 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2025 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East Champaran ====================================================== Tahid Ansari @ Raja Babu @ Tauhid Ansari S/o Jakir Hussain R/o VillageRadhiya, Rai Tola, P.S.- Govindganj, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Irfanul Haque, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 25-03-2026 Heard Md. Irfanul Haque, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh-1, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Govindganj P.S Case No-184/2025 instituted under Sections 91(2), 191(3), 190,126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 324(4), 352, 351(2) lodged on 20.07.2025 by the informant, Mofeez Ansari.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on 18.07.2025, the accused persons armed variously came and the allegation is that Hasimuddin Ansari assaulted Irfan Ansari by Farsa on head whereas Akhlaqur Rahman assaulted Ambiya Khatoon on her head beside Tahid Anshari (the petitioner herein) gave blow on the head of the Nawab Ali.

4. The allegation is that thereafter, the accused persons resorted to indiscriminate beating and this led to the FIR.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only role against him has been assigned that he gave blow to Nawab Ali.

6. Learned APP, Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh has taken this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17333 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026 2/2 Court to the learned Sessions Judge order to show that beside the injured persons whose nature of injury has been recorded as grievous, in the case of Nawab Ali also, it has been recorded that the injury is grievous in nature.

7. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the nature of injury that has come against this petitioner, this Court is not inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail.

8. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

9. Before parting, this Court would like to put on record its word of appreciation for Md. Irfanul Haque, learned counsel for the petitioner for the proper assistance rendered by him. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U T