← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6611/2020dismissed

The Union Of India, v. Uma Devi,

2021-11-15Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh,Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6611 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

The Union of India, through the Secretary, Department of Posts, Govt. of India, Sansad Marg, Dak Bhawan, New Delhi - 110001. 2.

The Director General, Department of Posts, Sansad Marg, Dak Bhawan, New Delhi- 110001.

3.

The Chief Postmaster General, Bihar Circle, Meghdoot Bhawan, Patna - 800001.

4.

The Director of Postal Services, Head Quarter, Bihar Circle, Meghdoot Bhawan, Patna - 800001.

5.

The Assistant Director (Recruitment), O/o of the CPMG Bihar, Meghdoot Bhawan, Patna- 800001.

6.

The Superintendent of Post Offices, Rohtas Division, Sasaram, PIN - 821115.

7.

The Inspector (Posts) Central Sub - Division, Sasaram, PIN - 821115. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Uma Devi, wife of Late Akshyabar Singh, Resident of Village - Maricup, P.O.- Nod, P.S.- Shivsagar, District- Rohtas, PIN- 821113. 2.

Jai Prakash Singh, Son of Akshyabar Singh, Resident of Village - Maricup, P.O.- Nod, P.S.- Shivsagar, District- Rohtas, PIN - 821113. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Om Prakash Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 15-11-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioners (Union of India) informs this Court that in compliance of the judgment and order of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 16.01.2019, passed in O.A. No. 53 of 2019, which is under challenge in the present

Patna High Court CWJC No.6611 of 2020(6) dt.15-11-2021 2/2 writ application, the respondent No. 2 has since been appointed on compassionate ground.

In view of subsequent development to the aforesaid effect, learned counsel for the petitioner does not intend to press this application.

This application is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ( Madhuresh Prasad, J) Rajesh/- U