Vipin Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4230 of 2024 ====================================================== Vipin Kumar Sharma, S/o Ram Charan Sharma, Resident of Mohalla- H.No.- 2B 262 Vasundhara, Sec, P.S.- Indirapuram, Distt.- Ghaziabad (Uttar Pradesh).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate Supaul. 2.

The District Magistrate Supaul, Distt.- Supaul. 3.

The Sub-Divisional Officer Supaul, Distt.- Supaul. 4.

The Superintendent of Police Supaul, Distt.- Supaul. 5.

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Supaul, Distt.- Supaul. 6.

The Officer in Charge Kishanpur Police Station, Distt.- Supaul. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Mahendra Thakur, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raghwanand, Government Advocate 11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 01-05-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a direction from this Court to direct the respondents to release the truck bearing registration no. UP-14FT-6879.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner is owner of the vehicle and the petitioner was engaged for the purpose of transporting the rice by one Bablu Choudhary and during its onward journey the same was seized by the official respondents on the ground that the transported rice was meant for public distribution system (PDS). The driver

2/4 of the vehicle has given the name of the petitioner as the owner of the vehicle and accordingly confiscation proceeding vide Supply Confiscation Case No. 03 of 2020 has been initiated on 20.01.2020. Learned counsel has stated that the petitioner is not concerned with the seized rice as he is not the owner of the same, but, only concerned with the release of the vehicle which was let out on hire.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on the judgment of this Hon'ble Court in C.W.J.C. No. 697 of 2022 and his contention is that under similar circumstances this Hon'ble Court was pleased to release the vehicle by imposing some conditions.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents has vehemently opposed the very maintainability of the writ petition and has stated that the vehicle of the petitioner was involved in an illegal transportation of public distribution system rice and the same was subject matter of the case which was booked under the Essential Commodities Act and also a criminal complaint was lodged with Kishanpur Police Station, bearing case no. 203 of 2019, registered on 28.08.2019 under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act.

6. A perusal of the judgment relied by the learned

3/4 counsel for the petitioner in C.W.J.C. No. 697 of 2022 reveals that under similar circumstances a Hon'ble Single Judge of this Court was pleased to release the vehicle relying on an earlier judgment of the Hon'ble High Court in C.W.J.C. No. 16455 of 2014 and also a judgment of this Court reported in 2020(4) BLJ, 50 (Vijay Shah Vrs. State of Bihar & Ors.) wherein the District Magistrate was directed to pass necessary order for release of the vehicle by imposing certain conditions.

7. Having regard to the same, this Court directs the Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Supaul, (respondent no. 2) to pass necessary order for release of the vehicle, bearing registration no. UP-14FT-6879 subject to the satisfaction of the Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Supaul, and the petitioner shall file an undertaking to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by the Collectorcum-District Magistrate, Supaul, for the purpose of future proceedings. The petitioner shall make available the adequate and sufficient security/surety (not in cash and by guarantee). The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Supaul, shall pass necessary orders for release of the vehicle and impose any condition that he may deem fit and proper before releasing the vehicle and the petitioner shall be required to abide by the same.

4/4

8. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Supaul, is directed to pass necessary orders within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt/communication of this order.

9. With the above direction, the writ application is disposed off accordingly.

(A. Abhishek Reddy , J) Bhardwaj/- U