Prince Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21148 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2023 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== PRINCE KUMAR S/O ARBIND YADAV @ ARVIND YADAV RESIDENT OF VILL.- SALAUNA BAKHRI, P.S.- BAKHRI, DIST.-BEGUSARAI. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jay Ram Prasad , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341 , 323 , 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code .
3 . As per the prosecution case , informant namely , Rinku Devi alleged that on 22.07.2023 at about 5:00 PM, while her son was going to home , in the meantime , this petitioner by intercepted his bicycle, abused and assaulted him. It is further
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21148 of 2025(2) dt.29-04-2025 2/3 alleged that on 24.07.2024 at about 5:00 PM, while his son was going to home , in the meantime, petitioner and other coaccused persons intercepted him and assaulted him by means of pistol due to which he sustained head injury . It is further alleged that accused persons also snatched gold chain from neck of son of informant and threatened him with dire consequences. It is further alleged that accused persons assaulted the nephew of informant, due to which he sustained injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both parties are co-villagers and due to petty dispute , a simple occurrence of maarpeet took place between them. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus against this petitioner. Injuries caused by this petitioner are simple in nature .
5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, nature of injury and circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM Begusarai in connection with Bakhari P.S. case No. 214 of 2023 , subject
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21148 of 2025(2) dt.29-04-2025 3/3 to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure .
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T