Sita Ram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51703 of 2017 (4) dt.28-02-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51703 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -442 Year- 2015 Thana -NARPATGANJ District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Sita Ram Yadav, Son of Late Uttim Lal Yadav, Resident of VillageBibiganj, P.S.- Narpatganj, District- Araria. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Matloob Rab, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No.222 of 2016, arising out of Narpatganj P.S. Case No.442 of 2015, registered for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier the petitioner has moved before this Court for bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No.43450 of 2016 and this Court vide order dated 16.11.2016 rejected the bail of the petitioner, reason has been assigned in the order. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has remained sufficiently in the jail custody as he is in jail since 03.07.2016 and further submits that direct allegation

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51703 of 2017 (4) dt.28-02-2018 has been made against Brahmdeo Sharma and one another, who have already been granted bail by this Court. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, namely, Sita Ram Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-II, Araria, subject to the condition that he would co-operate in the disposal of the case and will remain present in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates, the Court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T