← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5489/2020disposed

Suresh Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-25Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5489 of 2020 ====================================================== Suresh Ram Son of Late Ugras Ram Resident of Village- Musaul Tola, Jahagirpur, P.S.- Sakara District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secretary Education Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Education Officer Muzaffarpur.

5.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Muzaffarpur. 6.

The District Treasury Officer Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Madanjeet Kumar (Gp20) Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-01-2024

1. The petitioner has filed the present writ application for a direction to the respondents to grant Matric Trained Pay Scale to the petitioner with effect from 01.10.2003 or upon completion of three years of his initial appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is fully covered by the judgment passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Abdus Sammad vs The State of Bihar & Ors. in C.W.J.C. No. 7322 of 2017 dated 11.04.2018.

3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State

Patna High Court CWJC No.5489 of 2020(7) dt.25-01-2024 2/2 submits that the present writ application may be disposed of in terms of Abdus Samad Case (Supra).

4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid submissions, the application is disposed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent no. 5 / District Progamme Officer (Establishment) Muzaffarpur by filing representation within a period of three weeks which shall be decided by the respondent no. 5 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation.

5. If it is found that the case of the petitioner is covered by the case of Abdus Samad (Supra), then similar benefit shall be granted to the petitioner.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) praful/- U