Sunil Mahto @ Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25172 of 2021 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29552 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-298 Year-2019 Thana- BAJPATTI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

SUNIL MAHTO @ SUNIL KUMAR, Son of Ram Chandra Mahto, 2.

RAJKISHORI DEVI @ RAJ KISHORI DEVI, Wife of Ram Chandra Mahto, Both Residents of Village- Genpur, Ward No.14, Tola- Bangaon, P.S.- Bajpatti, Distt- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Devendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-07-2021 Heard the parties through virtual Court proceedings. Let the defects, if any, be removed within two weeks of the start of the physical Court.

This application is for modification of order dated 12.01.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 29552/2020 whereby the petitioners were allowed anticipatory bail in connection with Sursand P.S. Case No.362/2019. However, the petitioners could not furnish bail bonds within time.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that inadvertently in prayer portion learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, Distt.-Sitamarhi has been typed instead of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25172 of 2021(2) dt.28-07-2021 2/2 Additional Sessions Judge-IInd cum Special Judge (Excise Act), Sitamarhi, as such the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, Distt.-Sitamarhi is correct. In view of the above, in the order dated 12.01.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 29552/2020, the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners in the prayer portion shall be read as 'learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate-Pupri, Distt.- Sitamarhi instead of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IInd cum Special Judge (Excise Act), District-Sitamarhi. For substantial justice, further six weeks' time is allowed to the petitioners to furnish bail bonds subject to condition that each of the petitioners shall deposit Rs.2,000/- (Two Thousand) in the Victim Compensation Fund and shall produce receipt of the same at the time of furnishing of the bail bonds.

Accordingly, the application stands allowed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T