Ramprit Sah @ Ramrit Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.3374 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -487 Year- 2016 Thana -MUFFASIL DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================
1. Ramprit Sah @ Ramrit Sah, Son of Late Dhodha Sah, Resident of Village- Loharpatti, P.S.- Bettiah Muffasil, District- West Champaran. .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt Usha Kumari No-1, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Bettiah Muffasil Police Station Case No.487 of 2016 registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2) (v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
The appellant and others are under suspicion to have committed murder of the husband of the informant for the reason that the husband of the informant was doing business along
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3374 of 2017 (2) dt.21-12-2017 P2/ with the appellant and others. Appellant has stated on oath that he has got no criminal antecedent.
Considering the aforesaid fact, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Bettiah Muffasil Police Station Case No.487 of 2016, with condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.
Accordingly, the appeal stands allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T