← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9858/2016dismissed

Ashok Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-04-04Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9858 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Ashok Kumar son of Late Ram Das Sao resident of Purani Bazar, Sohsarai, P.S. Sohsarai, District- Nalanda.

2.

Jagdish Prasad son of Late Pokhan Prasad resident of Village- Kaje Etwar Sarai, P.S. Rahui, district- Nalanda.

3.

Sao Devi, wife of Jawahar Sao resident of Purani Bazar, Sohsarai, P.S. Sohsarai, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar.

2.

The District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif . 3.

The Circle Officer, Biharsharif Anchal, District- Nalanda. 4.

The Chief Inspector, Biharsharif Anchal, District- Nalanda. 5.

The Revenue Karamchari, Halka No.01, Biharsharif Anchal, DistrictNalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.SC 9- Raj Nandan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 04-04-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs :- " (i) To quash the memo bearing no. 1264 dated 22.04.2016 issued from the office of Circle Officer, Biharsharif, (Nalanda) under the signature of Circle Officer, Biharsharif, Nalanda, by which the petitioners have been ordered to file show cause supported with documentary evidence by 30.04.2016 as to why the encroachment made by them over plot no. 797 appertaining to Khata No. 47 be

Patna High Court CWJC No.9858 of 2016(2) dt.04-04-2023 2/2 not removed.

(ii) To direct the respondent authorities not to initiate encroachment proceeding against Rep the petitioners in respect of their private land i.e. plot no. 797 mentioned in memo no.

1264 dated 12.04.2016.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to avail such other alternative remedies, as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty so sought, is granted.

The writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U