Sajjan Mahto @ Sajjan Bind @ Sajan Bind v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.55179 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -344 Year- 2016 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================
1. SAJJAN MAHTO @ SAJJAN BIND @ SAJAN BIND Son of Late Ishwar Mahto Resident of Village - Ganga Prasad Bind Toli, P.S. - Barauni (Chakiya), District - Begusarai.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandrasen Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2017 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Barauni P.S.Case No. 344 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.
Earlier prayer for bail has been rejected vide order dated 23.02. 2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 8036 of 2017, vide Annexure-1 with direction that trial court conclude the trial within six months and if the trial is not concluded within the prescribed period, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the Court below itself.
Submission of the learned counsel for the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55179 of 2017 (2) dt.22-11-2017 2/2 petitioner is that in seven witnesses, only three witnesses has already been examined.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
In view of the facts as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. However, learned Trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude the same within three months. There is no latches on the part of the petitioner and the learned Court below shall release the petitioner on his own satisfaction and the petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of the trial and make himself available as and when required by the Court and on the event of his part to appear before the Court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T