← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54776/2017bail granted

Uma Shankar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-17Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54776 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54776 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -493 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Uma Shankar Singh, son of Late Durga Singh, resident of VillageGangauli, P.O. Dalmiya Nagar, P.S. Dalmiya Nagar (Dehri), DistrictRohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Excise Case No. 493 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 10 litres of mahua liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has been in judicial custody since 05.10.2017 and though he is accused in one more case but that is not of similar nature as the present one. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54776 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017 bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 02nd Additional Sessions Judge, cum Special Court, Excise, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Excise Case No. 493 of 2017, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T