Anil Rajvanshi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18407 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-753 Year-2024 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Anil Rajvanshi S/O Ramsaran Rajvanshi R/O Vill.- Pathula, P.S.- Wazirganj, Dist.- Gaya, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pratik Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-04-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126, 115, 118, 109, 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 06.10.2024 at 07:00 PM, accused Lav Kush Rajvanshi assaulted his wife by gandasa causing injury on head while petitioner assaulted his son by an iron rod (khanti) causing injury on head and Rinki, Pinki along with Reeta assaulted his daughter-in-law and Pinki snatched her chain.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant, it is next submitted that no reason for the occurrence
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18407 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026 2/2 is alleged. It is also submitted that petitioner and the informant and neighbours and are having dispute relating to passage. It is further submitted that no doubt allegation is of assaulting the son of the informant by khanti causing injury on head, but then the injury has been opined to be simple and the blow is not alleged to be repeated and petitioner is not a criminal.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 753 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.
7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T