Lalan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54437 of 2017 (2) dt.16-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54437 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -154 Year- 2017 Thana -KARAHGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Lalan Singh Son of Jagdeyal Singh, R/o Village- Krishnapur, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chaubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kargahar P.S. Case No. 154 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case is that petitioner along with other three persons were firing in dance during marriage ceremony, in which one of the bullet fired by co-accused hit brother of informant due to which he died.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner save and except the allegation against the petitioner that he was also firing in the marriage ceremony, there is no specific allegation has been made against the petitioner. Further he has been in custody for last five months and has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54437 of 2017 (2) dt.16-11-2017 the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Sasaram, Rohtas, in connection with Kargahar P.S. Case No. 154 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T