Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10138 of 2015 =========================================================== Manoj Kumar, son of Sri Dhanu Prasad, resident of village- Maulinagar, P.S. Maner, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Executive Officer, Garden Division, Building Construction Department, Patna.

3. The Garden Officer, Garden Division, Building Construction Department, Patna.

4. The Executive Engineer, Garden Division, Building Construction Department, Patna.

5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Building Construction Department, Patna.

6. The Junior Engineer, Garden Division, Building Construction Department, Patna.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Mistry, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Alok Ranjan, A.C. to G.A.-6 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 14-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2.

In the present case, the petitioner is claiming that he was allotted the work by the Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department for cutting and purning of trees under Garden Division, Patna for they year 2014-15, which is apparently clear from Annexure-1 (series) and the statement made in paragraph No.5 of this writ application.

Patna High Court CWJC No.10138 of 2015 dt.14-02-2017 2/2 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has completed the work, but has not been paid any amount.

4.

In such view of the matter, let the Executive Officer, Garden Division, Building Construction Department, Patna examine the claim of the petitioner. For convenience, the petitioner is directed to file a detailed representation before the Executive Officer, Garden Division, Building Construction Department, Patna. If such a representation is filed by the petitioner, the Executive Officer will be obliged to decide the same in accordance within law. If it is found that the petitioner has carried out the work, then the amount which the petitioner is entitled to, will be paid to him without unnecessary delay. The entire exercise will be completed by the Executive Officer within a period of three months from the date of filing of representation by the petitioner. 5.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N/A.

Uploading Date 15.02.2017 Transmission Date N/A.