Dilip Kumar Baitha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17364 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2018 Thana- BISHUNPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Dilip Kumar Baitha, aged about 22 years (Male), Son of Rajendra Baitha Resident of Village - Rampur Dih, P.S.- Bishanpur, Distt - Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinay Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bishanpur P.S. Case No. 71 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 363, 366(A), 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the present case, an allegation has been made against the petitioner of kidnapping the victim girl for the purpose of marriage.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the parties have entered into marriage. He further submits that the girl in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has stated her age as 19 years and has married with the petitioner on her own will.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17364 of 2019(2) dt.26-03-2019 2/2 Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, VII, Darbhanga in connection with Bisanpur P.S. Case No. 71 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T