Raju Saw @ Raju Sao And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53931 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -209 Year- 2017 Thana -AKBARPUR District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Raju Saw @ Raju Sao, Son of Sita Ram Saw,

2. Dinesh Sao, Son ofo Sita Ram Saw, Both are Resident of VillageChautha, Police Station-Rajauli in the District of Nawada .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Reena Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Akabarpur P.S.Case no.209 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation against the petitioner sis about recovery of 70.5 ltrs. of English wine from the possession of the petitioner. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that he has been falsely implicated in this case. They have no criminal antecedent and they are in custody for about two months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53931 of 2017 (2) dt.15-11-2017 2/2 be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J.-II-cum-Spl. Judge, Nawada in connection with Akbarpur P.S.Case No.209 of 2017 (G.R.No.2755 of 2017).

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T