← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24543/2019dismissed

Lalan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-13Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 24543 of 2019 Arising Out of PS Case No.-1218 Year-2016 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Lalan Sah, aged about 26 years, (Male), Son of Shri Nandlal Sah, Residents of Village - Narpaliya, P.S.- Manjhi, District - Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Chinki Kumari, aged about 19 years, (Female) Daughter of Sri Asheshar Gupta, Resident of North Mandiri, P.S.- Budha Colony, P.O. - G.P.O., District - Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the State :

Mr. Md. Arif, APP For the O P No. 2 :

Mr. Vijay Shankar Srivastava, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 13-08-2019 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 have assisted the Court.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1218(C) of 2016 dated 18.04.2016 instituted under Sections 376 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner in Complaint Case No. 1218(C) of 2016 dated 18.04.2016, is of having married the opposite party no. 2 but thereafter, turning her out of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24543 of 2019 dt.13-08-2019 2/2 matrimonial home and terming the marriage to be a drama and also disowning the marriage.

4. Learned APP and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 submitted that there is a certificate and affidavit of both the parties in support of such marriage which has not been denied to be forged and fabricated by the petitioner.

5. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U T