Rubi Kumari v. The Vice Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7769 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.
Rubi Kumari Wife of Abhijeet Mahanama Resident of Village- Sahpur, P.O.- Murli Bashantpur, P.S. and District- Saharsa- 852202. 2.
Gunjan Kumari Daughter of Arun Yadav, Wife of Kaushlendra Kumar Resident of Village and P.O.- Sinmgian, Ward No.14, P.S.- Gamhariya, District- Madhepura.
3.
Pappu Sada Son of Sri Sibo Sada Resident of Village- Chautara, Ward No.12, P.O.- Muradpur, P.S.- Nauhatta, District- Saharsa- 852123. 4.
Ram Bilash Paswan Son of Sri Hareram Paswan Resident of Aina Mahal, Sardar Tola Abdullanagar, P.O.- Gulabbaag, P.S.- Purnea Sadar, DistrictPurnea- 824326. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Vice Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura. 2.
The Registrar, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura. 3.
The Examination Controller, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura. 4.
The Principal, Adarsh College Ghailarh-Jiwachpur, Madhepura. 5.
The Principal, B.N.M.U. College Sahugarh, Madhepura. 6.
The Principal, M.L.T. College, Saharsa.
7.
The Principal, Purnea College, Purnea.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kumar Ravi Shankar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Ritesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 26-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In the instant petition, petitioners have prayed for following relief/reliefs:
"The present writ application being filed on behalf of the petitioners for direction (s) upon the respondents authorities to issue his original certificate of B.A./B.Sc. (Hons.) in different subject as petitioners had already passed the said examination finally, however till date the aforesaid original certificate have
Patna High Court CWJC No.7769 of 2021 dt.26-11-2021 2/2 not been issued in favour of the petitioners as such aforesaid action of the respondents are illegal, arbitrary, discrimination and colourable exercise of petitioners."
The Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that in terms of counter affidavit and the regulation do not provide for repeated examination therefore question of announcing the result of the repeated examination is not warranted.
This Court in identical matter in CWJC No. 6640 of 2021 decided on 23.11.2021. For no fault of the petitioners and on default of the College and University, the University has to announce the result. In the light of the aforesaid decision, accordingly, the respondent University is hereby directed to announce the result of the petitioners within a period of four weeks.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J) GAURAV S./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 30.11.2021 Transmission Date NA