← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45191/2018bail granted

Ramjee Poddar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-29Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45191 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -163 Year- 2017 Thana -SONBERSA District- SAHARSA ====================================================== Ramjee Poddar, son of Late Banarshi Poddar, resident of Village- Parariya, P.S.- Sonbarsa Raj (Kash Nagar O.P.), District- Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sameer Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 29-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner, being the father-in-law of the deceased lady, is in custody since 30.10.2017 in connection with S.T. No.67 of 2018 arising out of Sonbarsa Raj P.S. Case No.163 of 2017 registered for the offence under Sections 302, 304B, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge has now been framed in this case and as per the liberty afforded by this Court earlier, the petitioner is renewing his prayer for bail. It is further submitted that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court at all material times so as not to cause any hindrance or delay the same.

In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45191 of 2018 (2) dt.29-08-2018 2/2 bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Saharsa, in connection with S.T. No.67 of 2018 arising out of Sonbarsa Raj P.S. Case No.163 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, son, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T