Meena Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28228 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2020 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran ====================================================== Meena Devi W/O- Arvind Kumar Giri Resident of Village - Raghunath Giri, P.S. - Manjhi, District - Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 504, 307, 324 and 302 of the IPC. It is a case of committing double murder by inflicting injuries upon the injured as well as deceased by the accused persons.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is a lady and allegation against her is that she caught hold the informant. He further submits that from perusal of the injury report of the informant, it appears that the injured sustained lacerated wound injury on the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28228 of 2021(4) dt.11-04-2022 2/2 vital part of the the body, i.e., on the right parital region. He further submits that there is no specific allegation of overt-act against the petitioner except caught hold of the informant. He further submits that co-accused, namely, Raj Kumari Giri and Arbind Giri who have specific overt-act of assault upon the deceased persons were granted regular bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court passed in Cr. Misc. No. 50341 of 2021 and 44142 of 2021 respectively. Petitioner has got clean antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named in the event of her arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-14, Saran at Chapra in connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No. 77 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T