Patna High CourtCR. WJC/896/2014disposed

Dinesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Director General Of Police, Govt, Of Bihar And ORS.

2015-03-19Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.896 of 2014 ====================================================== Dinesh Kumar, Son of Ram Briksha Singh, resident of village-Bharman Chak, Police Station-Saksohra, District-Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Barh, Patna.

4. The S.H.O. Saksohra Police Station, Patna, Bihar.

5. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur.

6. The S.H.O. Sadar Kotwali Police Station, Bhagalpur.

7. Shri Abhimanyu Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar, son of Sri Ramsaresh Prasad, resident of village-Bhawanchak, Post Office and Police Station-Saksohra Via Barh District-Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Premchandra Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, AC to GP-26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 19-03-2015 In the instant application filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the prayer of the petitioner is to direct the respondents to arrest one Shri Abhimanyu Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar who is accused in connection with Bhagalpur Kotwali P.S. Case No. 750 of 2008 registered under Sections 409, 419, 420, 422, 423, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 478 of the

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.896 of 2014 (2) dt.19-03-2015 2 / 2 Indian Penal Code.

At the outset, learned counsel for the State has submitted that the accused Abhimanyu Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar has already been arrested by the police on 4.9.2014 in Bhagalpur Kotwali P.S. Case No. 750 of 2008.

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the State, since the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, the application has become infructuous. Accordingly, the application is disposed of as infructuous.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T